I think that the
Architecture Career needs some reforms to improve the quality of both the
student and the subject we pass and how we learn, it is very important the
branches we have and the equality of conditions that arises at the time of
passing the contents between sections and or teachers since in some branches
the gap of content and the way of teaching is very large that some students in
a section they can be repeated and in other sections they all pass with
averages with grades above 5 or 6.
The current
branches are fine most but there are some fillers that do not achieve the
programmed learning objectives, and only become tedious or one more task within
the discipline.
On the other
hand, in Chile and in this university specifically the number of years is very
wide reaching 6 years, but normally the career is extended by various problems
that may be had and finally the studies are finished in more time
Related to the
repetition of branches are the scholarships and uses of these that have a
fundamental role for the payment of our studies that do not allow extensions of
the scholarships when the percentage of students who graduate with the right
years of the career is very low
As for the use of
technologies I am amazed in this situation, the use of programs in the first
semesters and the intuitive learning that is created when using them, I have
enjoyed the experience of digital tools to capture much better the idea I have
and be more precise with my representation.
Comentarios
Publicar un comentario